Pengembangan Model Kewirausahaan Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kualitas Kurikulum Pendidikan Melalui Pemanfaatan Teknologi Kecerdasan Buatan

Authors

I Gede Kahar Suputra Universitas Koperasi Indonesia
Jaka Sudewa Universitas Koperasi Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v15i3.4732

Keywords:

Project-Based Learning (PBL), ChatGPT, Entrepreneurial Competencies

Abstract

This study explores the impact of integrating ChatGPT into the Project-Based Learning (PBL) model on students' entrepreneurial competencies at IKOPIN University. The background of this research is the need for innovative learning approaches in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, focusing on the role of artificial intelligence in education. The study employs a quantitative approach with an explanatory survey design, collecting data from students participating in the KBBK program based on PBL integrated with ChatGPT. The sample was selected purposively, and the data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The Confirmatory Factor Analysis results indicate a good model fit after the removal of 16 indicators, leaving 8 indicators with a CMIN/DF of 1.406, a P-value of 0.122, a GFI of 0.973, and an RMSEA of 0.045. The results show that PBL has a significant positive impact on the use of ChatGPT (coefficient 0.068) and the enhancement of entrepreneurial competencies (coefficient 0.083). Instrument validity was tested with factor loadings above 0.5, and reliability was confirmed with Cronbach's Alpha above 0.7. This study emphasizes the importance of technology integration in education to enhance students' competencies, with recommendations for improving infrastructure, training, and developing an adaptive curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babbie, E. (2010). The Practice of Social Research (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Bacigalupo, Margherita & Kampylis, Panagiotis & Punie, Yves & Van den Brande, Lieve. (2016). EntreComp: The Entrepreneurship Competence Framework. 10.2791/593884.

Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43. doi:10.1080/00098650903505415

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Byrne, B.M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Third Edition (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421

Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008). Selecting Learning Tasks: Effects on Task Performance and Transfer of Learning. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 114-127. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.006

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Gibb, A. (2002). In Pursuit of a New ‘Enterprise’ and ‘Entrepreneurship’ Paradigm for Learning: Creative Destruction, New Values, New Ways of Doing Things and New Combinations of Knowledge. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(3), 233-269. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00086

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Jones, B., & Iredale, N. (2010). Enterprise Education as Pedagogy. Education + Training, 52(1), 7-19. doi:10.1108/00400911011017654

Neck, H. M., Greene, P. G., & Brush, C. G. (2014). Teaching Entrepreneurship: A Practice-Based Approach. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97-115). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Comput. Educ., 94, 252-275.

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.

Yu, Z., & Guo, H. (2023). Impact of AI-Assisted Learning Tools on Student Engagement and Performance in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 184, 104540. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104540

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Suputra, I. G. K., & Sudewa, J. . (2024). Pengembangan Model Kewirausahaan Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kualitas Kurikulum Pendidikan Melalui Pemanfaatan Teknologi Kecerdasan Buatan. Coopetition : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 15(3), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v15i3.4732