Membangun Fondasi Complementary Agenda Untuk  Transformasi Digital Bisnis

Arip  Hidayatullah; Franciskus  Antonius Alijoyo

doi:10.32670/coopetition.v15i1.4306

Authors

Arip Hidayatullah School of Business and Information Techology STMIK LIKMI Bandung - Indonesia
Franciskus Antonius Alijoyo School of Business and Information Techology STMIK LIKMI Bandung - Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v15i1.4306

Keywords:

Business Process Management, Digital Innovation, rocess Aware Information Systems

Abstract

Digital innovation is fundamentally changing the business landscape, driving advances in products, processes and business models. It involves complex interactions between technological and social aspects, creating ambiguity between process and product. It is important to understand how digital innovation impacts business process management. This study uses a literature approach to explore the concepts of digital innovation and business process management. The research was conducted by analyzing related literature from various academic and professional sources, including scientific journals, books and industry publications. Digital innovation not only creates technological progress, but also changes social processes and organizational structures. This phenomenon can be seen in platforms such as Uber or DevOps, which show a close connection between product and process. Digital innovation also enables continuous evolution and improvement of products and processes over time. Business process management is becoming increasingly important in facing the challenges and opportunities brought by digital innovation. Agile and adaptive process management strategies are needed to cope with rapid changes in the digital business environment. From the literature analysis, it appears that integration between digital innovation and business process management is very important. To optimize the benefits of digital innovation, organizations need to adopt an agile and adaptive approach in their process management. This involves continuous adaptation to technological and social changes as well as increased collaboration between various functions within the organization. Suggestions for future research are to conduct more in-depth empirical studies to understand the concrete impact of digital innovation on business process management, as well as to develop a practical framework for applying process management principles in the context of digital innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alijoyo, A. (2004). Komisaris Independen: Penggerak Praktik GCG di Perusahaan. Jakarta: PT. Indeks, 2004.

Alijoyo, A. (2007). Etika Bisnis Dalam Corporate Code of Conduct. Grafika Utama, Jakarta.

Alijoyo, A. (2011a). Knowledge: Pertahanan 3 Lapis (The 3 Lines of Defense)-Konteks ERM Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia. CRMS Indonesia Website. Accessed February, 26, 2016.

Alijoyo, A. (2011b). Memadukan Balance Score Card (BSC) dan Enterprise Risk Manajemen (ERM). Center for Risk Management Studies (CRMS), July. http://crmsindonesia.org/files/Balanced Scorecard dan Enterprise Risk Management artikel newsletter July 2011.pdf

Ancillai, C., Sabatini, A., Gatti, M., & Perna, A. (2023). Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122307

Ates, A., & Acur, N. (2022). Making obsolescence obsolete: Execution of digital transformation in a high-tech manufacturing SME. Journal of Business Research, 152, 336–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.052

Bresciani, S., Huarng, K.-H., Malhotra, A., & Ferraris, A. (2021). Digital transformation as a springboard for product, process and business model innovation. Journal of Business Research, 128, 204–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.003

Cha, H. (2020). A paradigm shift in the global strategy of MNEs towards business ecosystems: A research agenda for new theory development. Journal of International Management, 26(3), 100755. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2020.100755

Conti, C., Hall, A., Percy, H., Stone-Jovicich, S., Turner, J., & McMillan, L. (2024). What does the agri-food systems transformation agenda mean for agricultural research organisations? Exploring organisational prototypes for uncertain futures. Global Food Security, 40, 100733. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100733

Dimitropoulos, P., Koronios, K., & Sakka, G. (2023). International business sustainability and global value chains: Synthesis, framework and research agenda. Journal of International Management, 29(5), 101054. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2023.101054

Gillani, F., Chatha, K. A., Jajja, S. S., Cao, D., & Ma, X. (2024). Unpacking Digital Transformation: Identifying key enablers, transition stages and digital archetypes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 203, 123335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123335

Kolagar, M., Parida, V., & Sjödin, D. (2022). Ecosystem transformation for digital servitization: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 146, 176–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.067

Kornyshova, E., Boutal, L., & Benramdane, M. K. (2023). Digital Business Ecosystems: Organizational Model, Roles, and Governance Towards Flexibility. Procedia Computer Science, 225, 4621–4630. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.460

Li, K., Kim, D. J., Lang, K. R., Kauffman, R. J., & Naldi, M. (2020). How should we understand the digital economy in Asia? Critical assessment and research agenda. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 44, 101004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101004

Liu, Y., Collinson, S., Cooper, S. C., & Baglieri, D. (2022). International business, innovation and ambidexterity: A micro-foundational perspective. International Business Review, 31(3), 101852. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101852

Manning, S., & Vavilov, S. (2023). Global development agenda meets local opportunities: The rise of development-focused entrepreneurship support. Research Policy, 52(7), 104795. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104795

Mariani, M. M., Machado, I., & Nambisan, S. (2023). Types of innovation and artificial intelligence: A systematic quantitative literature review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113364

Mora, L., Gerli, P., Ardito, L., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2023). Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda. Technovation, 123, 102717. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102717

Nyagadza, B. (2022). Sustainable digital transformation for ambidextrous digital firms: systematic literature review, meta-analysis and agenda for future research directions. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 1(3), 100020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100020

Opland, L. E., Pappas, I. O., Engesmo, J., & Jaccheri, L. (2022). Employee-driven digital innovation: A systematic review and a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 143, 255–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.038

Piccoli, G., Grover, V., & Rodriguez, J. (2024). Digital transformation requires digital resource primacy: Clarification and future research directions. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 33(2), 101835. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101835

Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2023). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 41(6), 821–844. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007

Sadovska, V., Fernqvist, F., & Barth, H. (2023). We do it our way – small scale farms in business model transformation for sustainability. Journal of Rural Studies, 102, 103090. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103090

Schaller, M., Redlich, M.-C., & Fischer, F. (2023). Chapter 16 - Digital health policies and participation for digital transformation in German-speaking countries: A critical approach. In P. O. de Pablos & X. B. T.-A. S. C. for D. T. in the H. I. Zhang (Eds.), Information Technologies in Healthcare Industry (Vol. 2, pp. 323–362). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15299-3.00016-6

Scholz, R. W., Zscheischler, J., Köckler, H., Czichos, R., Hofmann, K.-M., & Sindermann, C. (2024). Transdisciplinary knowledge integration – PART I: Theoretical foundations and an organizational structure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 202, 123281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123281

Shen, L., Shi, Q., Parida, V., & Jovanovic, M. (2024). Ecosystem orchestration practices for industrial firms: A qualitative meta-analysis, framework development and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 173, 114463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114463

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

Yáñez-Valdés, C., & Guerrero, M. (2024). Determinants and impacts of digital entrepreneurship: A pre- and post-COVID-19 perspective. Technovation, 132, 102983. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102983

Zahoor, N., Khan, Z., & Shenkar, O. (2023). International vertical alliances within the international business field: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of World Business, 58(1), 101385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101385