Management Accounting System Dimensions as Mediating The Effect of Decentralization and Environmental Uncertainty on Managerial Performance

Authors

Glen Lazwardi Qurba Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v14i1.2781

Keywords:

Decentralization, Environmental Uncertainty, Management Accounting System, Managerial Performance, Management Accounting

Abstract

This research aims to determine and examine the effect of Decentralization and Environmental Uncertainty on Managerial Performance with the Management Accounting System as Intervening Variables in STARKES Accredited Hospitals in Bandung. The research method used is a combination method: sequential explanatory design. This study uses primary data consisting of questionnaires and interviews. The total population of this study is 11 hospitals. This research is hypothesis testing research. The research model was analyzed using PLS (Partial Least Square) analysis. The analysis results show that the management accounting system can mediate the effect of decentralization on managerial performance, where the company is more decentralized and supported by a high management accounting system, which will produce an adequate managerial performance. In addition, the management accounting system can mediate the effect of environmental Uncertainty on managerial performance. The higher the environmental Uncertainty and supported by the high use of MAS (Management Accounting System), the more adequate managerial performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cai, T., Guo, S., Li, Y., Peng, D., Zhao, X., & Liu, Y. (2018). Quantitative stress measurement of elastic deformation using mechanoluminescent sensor: An intensity ratio model. Review of Scientific Instruments, 89(4), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5024417

Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The Impact of Structure, Environment, and Interdependence on the Perceived Usefulness of Management Accounting Systems. Source: The Accounting Review, 61(1), 16–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/247520%5Cnhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

Chia, Y. M. (1995). Decentralization, Management Accounting System (Mas) Information Characteristics and Their Interaction Effects on Managerial Performance: a Singapore Study. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22(6), 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1995.tb00390.x

Gordon, L. A., & Narayanan, V. K. (1984). Management accounting systems, perceived environmental Uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(84)90028-X

Hammad, S. A., Jusoh, R., Ghozali, I., Hammad, S. A., Jusoh, R., & Ghozali, I. (2013). Article information :

Mariana, A. (2009). Pengaruh Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen terhadap Kinerja Manajerial dengan Ketidakpastian Lingkungan dan Desentralisasi sebagai Variabel Moderating. Jai, 5(2), 131–141.

Mia, L. (1993). The role of management accounting information in organisations: An empirical study. In British accounting review (Vol. 25, pp. 269–285).

Nata, K. B. W. A., & Wirakusuma, M. G. (2020). The Effect of Business Strategy and Decentralization in The Relationship Between The Characteristics of Management Accounting Information System and Managerial Performance Unit Leader in PT Bank BPD Bali. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 21(5), 193–198.

Nazaruddin, I., & Fajry, S. (2005). Pengaruh Customization dan Interdependensi terhadap Karakteristik Informasi Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Broad scope dan Aggregation. Jurnal Akuntansi & Investasi, 6(1), 94–113.

Nuraisiah, R. (2018). Pengaruh Intensitas Persaingan, Delegasi, Strategi Dan Perubahan Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi. Progress: Jurnal Pendidikan, Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.47080/progress.v1i1.133

Octavia Feronica, I. (2013). Pengaruh Desentralisasi dan Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajer Dealer Di Manado. Jurnal EMBA, 1 No.3(3), 818–825.

Paylosa, F. (2014). Pengaruh Strategi Manajer Dan Desentralisasi Yang Saling Terhubung Antara Pemanfaatan Informasi Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Dengan Kinerja Manajeril. Jurnal Akuntansi FE Universitas Negeri Padang, Volume 9,(1), 1–20.

Pizzini, M. J. (2006). The relation between cost-system design, managers’ evaluations of the relevance and usefulness of cost data, and financial performance: An empirical study of US hospitals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(2), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.11.001

Shao-Hsi Chung,. (2012). Broad scope management accounting system and managerial performance: The impact of role ambiguity and functional difference. African Journal of Business Management, 6(30), 8873–8878. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm11.2181

Sigilipu, S. (2013). Pengaruh Penerapan Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen Dan Sistem. Jurnal EMBA, 1(3), 239–247.

Society, B. (2004). The Effect Of Contingency Variables On Management Accounting System Characteristics And Managerial Performance. 12(2), 47–70.

Soobaroyen, T., & Poorundersing, B. (2008). The effectiveness of management accounting systems: Evidence from functional managers in a developing country. In Managerial Auditing Journal (Vol. 23, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810839866

Sulaeman, M., & Kusnandar, H. F. (2017). Pengaruh informasi akuntansi dan ketidakpastian tugas terhadap kinerja manajerial (studi pada PDAM Tirta Anom Banjar). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Mercu Buana, 3(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.26486/jramb.v3i2.413

Thompson, JD 1986. Organizations in Action. Mc. Graw-Hill. Waterhouse, JH and Tiessen. 1995. A

Contingency Framework for Management Accounting Systems Research, Accounting, in

Managerial Accounting – The Behavioral Foundation. JL Livingstone, Columbus, Ohio: Grid

Inc. pp. 65 – 80.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-19

How to Cite

Lazwardi Qurba, G. . (2023). Management Accounting System Dimensions as Mediating The Effect of Decentralization and Environmental Uncertainty on Managerial Performance. Coopetition : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 14(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v14i1.2781