Menggunakan Paradigma Studi Kasus Kualitatif Interpretatif Online dan Offline Untuk Memahami Efektivitas Penerapan E-Procurement

Authors

Nurdin Nurdin Universitas Islam Negeri Datokarama Palu
Sagaf S. Pettalongi Universitas Islam Negeri Datokarama Palu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v13i2.1518

Keywords:

Socia media, interpretif study, e-procurement efectiveness, research paradigm

Abstract

The presence of social media allows researchers to consider new data collection and triangulation strategies. Positivist researchers take advantage of the internet's presence as a medium for collecting data. Meanwhile, interpretive qualitative researchers have not utilized the potential provided by social media to enrich data collection in order to deepen understanding of a topic being researched. By using the case of the effectiveness of the application of e-procurement in a district, the researcher conducted face-to-face interviews (offline) and also observed discussions on social media and content sharing about the implementation and use of government e-procurement in a district. This study uses an interpretative qualitative paradigm to describe how social media exchanges, uploads, and conversations can be used as a means of collecting data in interpretive qualitative research. The results of this study indicate that social media observation can be used as a research tool to increase understanding of a topic being studied and also as a triangulation medium. This study also proves that the use of social media in interpretive studies can reduce challenges in informant recruitment, access to research sites, and reduce bias in interviews. This research contributes to the understanding of a research topic using data from two environments.Keywords:Social media, interpretif study, e-procurement effectiveness, research paradigm

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agarwal, N., & Liu, H. (2008). Blogosphere: research issues, tools, and applications. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 10(1), 18-31. doi: 10.1145/1412734.1412737

Aggarwal, R., Gopal, R., Sankaranarayanan, R., & Singh, P. V. (2012). Blog, Blogger, and the Firm: Can Negative Employee Posts Lead to Positive Outcomes? Information Systems Research, 23(2), 306-322. doi: doi:10.1287/isre.1110.0360

Angen, M. J. (2000). Evaluating Interpretive Inquiry: Reviewing the Validity Debate and Opening the Dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 378-395. doi: 10.1177/104973230001000308

Aral, S., Dellarocas, C., & Godes, D. (2013). Social Media and Business Transformation: A Framework for Research. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 3-13. doi: 10.1287/isre.1120.0470

Balsevich, A., Pivovarova, S., & Podkolzina, E. (2011). Information Transparency in Public Procurement: How It Works in Russian Regions. Moskwo, Russia: Center for Institutional Studies, Higher School of Economics.

Batenburg, R. (2007). E-procurement adoption by European firms: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(3), 182-192. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2007.09.014

Bauer, M. W., & Jovchelovitch, S. (2000). Narrative interviewing. In P. Atkinson, M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskel (Eds.), Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook for Social Research (pp. 374). London: LSE Research Online.

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., Munson, S., & Glaisyer, T. (2010). Social Media Technology and Government Transparency. Computer 43(11), 53-59.

Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123-132. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001

Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

Breslin, J., & Decker, S. (2007). The Future of Social Networks on the Internet: The Need for Semantics. Internet Computing, IEEE, 11(6), 86-90. doi: 10.1109/MIC.2007.138

Cantrell, M. A., & Lupinacci, P. (2007). Methodological issues in online data collection. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(5), 544-549. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04448.x

Carayannis, E. G., & Popescu, D. (2005). Profiling a methodology for economic growth and convergence: learning from the EU e-procurement experience for central and eastern European countries. Technovation, 25(1), 1-14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00071-3

Cavaye, A. L. M. (1996). Case study Research: A Multi-faceted research Approach For IS. Information Systems Journal, 6(3), 227-242.

Cisar, O. (2003). Strategies for Using Information Technologies for Curbing Public-Sector Corruption: The Case of the Czech Republic. Retrieved 01 August 2011 http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/00001820/01/Cisar.pdf

Cooper, C. J., Cooper, S. P., del Junco, D. J., Shipp, E. M., Whitworth, R., & Cooper, S. R. (2006). Web-based data collection: detailed methods of a questionnaire and data gathering tool. Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I, 3, 1-1. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-3-1

Crabtree, A., Nichols, D. M., O'Brien, J., Rouncefield, M., & Twidale, M. B. (2000). Ethnomethodologically informed ethnography and information system design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 666-682. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:7<666::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-5

Cresswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. London: Sage Publications.

Cresswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 9(3), 124-130.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4 ed.). Boston: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall

Croom, S. R., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2005). Key Issues in E-Procurement : Procurement Impleementation and Operation in the Public Sector JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, 5(3), 367-387.

da Cunha, J. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2008). Performing catharsis: The use of online discussion forums in organizational change. Information and Organization, 18(2), 132-156. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.02.001

Darke, P., Shanks, G., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Sucessfully Completing Case Study Research: Combining Rigour, Relevance, and Pragmatism. Information Systems Journal, 8, 273-289.

Dean, J. P., & Whyte, W. F. (1958). How Do You Know If the Informant is Telling the Truth? Human Organization, 17(2), 34-38.

Doolin, B. (1998). Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretive research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology (Routledge, Ltd.), 13(4), 301.

Eide, P., & Allen, C. B. (2005). Recruiting Transcultural Qualitative Research Participants: A Conceptual Model. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(2), 44-56.

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x

European-Commision. (2011). E-Procurement Reduces Opportunities For Corruption and Bribery http://www.transparencyinternational.eu

Geertz, C. (1973). Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. New York Basic.

Germonprez, M., & Hovorka, D. S. (2013). Member engagement within digitally enabled social network communities: new methodological considerations. Information Systems Journal, 23(6), 525-549. doi: 10.1111/isj.12021

Greene, J. A., Choudhry, N. K., Kilabuk, E., & Shrank, W. H. (2010). Online Social Networking by Patients with Diabetes: A Qualitative Evaluation of Communication with Facebook. Journal General Internal Medicine 26(3), 287-292.

Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C., & McDonald, D. (2011). Triangulation: Establishing the Validity of Qualitative Studies. Retrieved 03 Pebruary 2014, from Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fy394

Guo, L., Tan, E., Chen, S., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2009). Analyzing patterns of user content generation in online social networks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, Paris, France.

Hookway, N. (2008). Entering the blogosphere’: some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 91-113.

Johnson, R. B. (1997). Examining the Validity Struture of Qualitative Research. Education, 118(2), 282-292.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Kane, G. C., & Fichman, R. G. (2009). The Shoemaker's Children: Using Wikis For Information Systems Teaching, Research, and Publication. MIS Quarterly, 33, 1-17.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59 - 68.

Karnieli-Miller, O., Strier, R., & Pessach, L. (2009). Power Relations in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 279-289. doi: 10.1177/1049732308329306

Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005

Kishor Vaidya, A. S. M. S., & Callender, G. (2006). Critical Factors that influence E-Procurement Implementation Success in the Public Sector JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, 6(1&3), 70-99.

Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretative Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67-94.

Kleinknecht, S. (2007). Special: An interview with Robert Prus: His Career, Contributions, and Legacy as an Interactionist Ethnographer and Social Theorist. Qualitative Sociology Review, 3(2), 221-288.

LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Designing and Conducting Ethnographic Research. Plymouth, UK: Altamira Press.

Lee, A. S. (1991). Integrating Positivist and Intepretive Approach to Organizational Research. Organizational Science, 2(4), 342-365.

Lefever, S., Dal, M., & Matthíasdóttir, Á. (2007). Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 574-582. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00638.x

Lou, E. C. W., & Alshawi, M. (2009). Critical Success For E-Tendering Implementation in Construction Collaborative Environments: People and Process Issues. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 14, 98-109.

Mahmood, S. A. I. (2010). Public Procurement and Corruption in Bangladesh Confronting the Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research 2(6), 103-111.

McConnell, D. J., Doherty, N. F., & Ellis-chadwick, F. (2010, 19-21 May 2010). Exploring the uptake and application of electronic procurement to central and local government. Paper presented at the Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2010 Fourth International Conference on.

Minger, J. (2001). Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 240-259.

Moon, M. J. (2005). E-Procurement Management in State Governments: Diffusion of E-Procurement Practices and Its Development JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, 5(1), 54-72.

Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publication, Inc.

Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013). Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 351-358. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016

Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2-26. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001

Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J., Gumbrecht, M., & Swartz, L. (2004). Why We: Blog. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM 47(12), 41-46.

Olsen, W. (2004). Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really Be Mixed. Developments in Sociology, 20(1), 103-121.

Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1-28.

Panayiotou, N. A., Gayialis, S. P., & Tatsiopoulos, I. P. (2004). An e-procurement system for governmental purchasing. International Journal of Production Economics, 90(1), 79-102. doi: 10.1016/s0925-5273(03)00103-8

Patel, M. X., Doku, V., & Tennakoon, L. (2003). Challenges in recruitment of research participants. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 9(3), 229-238. doi: 10.1192/apt.9.3.229

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.

Pousti, H., Urquhart, C., Burstein, F., & Linger, H. (2013). Methodological implications of social media as a research setting for IS studies in healthcare: Reflections from a grounded theory study. Paper presented at the 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems 4-6 Dec 2013, Melbourne, Melbourne Australia.

Pyett, P. M. (2003). Validation of Qualitative Research in the “Real World”. Qualitative Health Research, 13(8), 1170-1179. doi: 10.1177/1049732303255686

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945. doi: 10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

Sade-Beck, L., & Beer-Sheva. (2004). Internet Ethnography: Online and Offline. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 3(2), 45-51.

Sarker, S., & Sahay, S. (2004). Implications of space and time for distributed work: an interpretive study of US–Norwegian systems development teams. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(3), 3-20.

Scheepers, R., & Scheepers, H. (2003). Contexts of Relevance in Explanatory Case Studies in Information Systems: Ubiquitous Information Technology Implementation in Organizations. Paper presented at the 24th International Conference on Information Systems Seattle, Wash. .

Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. D. Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.

Shah, A., & Schacter, M. (2004). Combating Corruption: Look Before You Leap. Retrieved 31 July 2012 http://www.12iacc.org/archivos/WS_6.2_CLIFF_ANWAR_SHAH_AND_MARK_SCHACTER.PDF

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (2 ed.). California, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Susarla, A., Jeong-Ha, O., & Yong, T. (2012). Social Networks and the Diffusion of User-Generated Content: Evidence from YouTube. Information Systems Research, 23(1), 23-41. doi: 10.1287/isre.1100.0339

Urquhart, C., & Fernandez, W. (2013). Using Grounded Theory Method in Information Systems: the Researcher as Blank Slate and Other Myths. Journal of Information Technology, 28(3), 1-13.

Urquhart, C., & Vaast, E. (2012). Building Social Media Theory from Case Studies : A New Frontier For IS Research Paper presented at the Thirty Third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando 2012, Orlando, USA.

Vaast, E., & Walsham, G. (2013). Grounded theorizing for electronically mediated social contexts. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 9-25.

Walsham, G. (1995). The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research. Information Systems Research, 6(4), 376-394.

Walsham, G. (2006). Doing Interpretive Research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320-330.

Wattal, S., Telang, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Boatwright, P. (2012). What's in a “Name”? Impact of Use of Customer Information in E-Mail Advertisements. Information Systems Research, 23(3-part-1), 679-697. doi: doi:10.1287/isre.1110.0384

Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522-537. doi: 10.1177/104973201129119299

Xia, L. (2013). Effects of Companies' Responses to Consumer Criticism in Social Media. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(4), 73-100. doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415170403

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research - Design and Method (3 ed.). London: Sage, Thousand Oaks.

Zeng, X., & Wei, L. (2013). Social Ties and User Content Generation: Evidence from Flickr. Information Systems Research, 24 (1), 71-87.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-06

How to Cite

Nurdin, N., & Pettalongi, S. S. (2022). Menggunakan Paradigma Studi Kasus Kualitatif Interpretatif Online dan Offline Untuk Memahami Efektivitas Penerapan E-Procurement. Coopetition : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 13(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v13i2.1518