Pengaruh Literasi Keuangan terhadap Perilaku Keuangan dengan Kelompok Generasi sebagai Mediasi dan Moderasi

Authors

  • Mochammad Rizaldy Insan Baihaqqy Universitas Islam Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v13i1.1189

Keywords:

Financial Literacy

Abstract

A country's economy is largely determined by public awareness of financial literacy, because it has an impact on its financial behavior, on a micro level this has implications for the level of welfare in the family and macro has implications for increasing national economic growth. The purpose of this study is to examine financial literacy on financial behavior in the generation group. This study uses a quantitative approach with survey methods, data analysis using conditional processes. The results showed that the generation group was able to mediate and moderate financial literacy on financial behavior ,this indicates that it is important for each generation group to continuously improve financial literacy in order to have good financial behavior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aminatuzzahra, A. (2014). Perception effect of financial knowledge, financial attitudes, social demography against financial behavior in individual investment decision making. Journal of Business Strategy, 23(2).

Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., Goyal, N., & Gaur, V. (2019). How financial literacy and demographic variables relate to behavioral biases. Managerial Finance, 45(1), 124–146.

Bencsik, A., Machova, R., & Hevesi, E. (2016). The relationship between motivation and personality type. International Journal of Academic.

Coskun, A., Sahin, M. A., & Ates, S. (2016). Impact of Financial Literacy on the Behavioral Biases of Individual Stock Investors: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(3), 1–1.

Costanza, D. P. et al. (2012). Generational differences in work- related attitudes: a meta- analysis. Journal of Business Psychology, 27, 375- 394. doi: 10.1007/s10869-012-9259-4.

Fattah, F. A. (2017). Pengaruh Literasi Keuangan dan Pengendalian Diri Terhadap Perilaku Konsumtif Siswa SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Karanganyar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bise.v4i1.20028

Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2020). Conditional process analysis: Concepts, computation, and advances in the modeling of the contingencies of mechanisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(1), 19-54.

Idrus, N., Ng, P. K., & Jee, K. S. (2014). Sustaining quality in higher education in Southeast Asia through understanding generational changes. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(16), 1819- 1827. doi: 10.3923/jas.2014.1819.1827.

Kansal, P., & Singh, S. (2018). Determinants of overconfidence bias in Indian stock market. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.

Pompian, Michael. M. (2006). Behavioral Finance and Wealth Management. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Prosad, J. M., Kapoor, S., & Sengupta, J. (2015). Behavioral biases of Indian investors: a survey of Delhi-NCR region. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.

Ramadhani, R. H. (2019). Pengaruh Literasi Keuangan, Electronic Money, Gaya Hidup, dan Kontrol Diri Terhadap Perilaku Konsumtif Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Strata-1 Manajemen Universitas Sumatera Utara).

Roebuck, D. B., Smith, D. N., & Haddaoui, T. E. (2013). Cross-generational perspectives on work-life balance and its impact on women’s opportunities for leadership in the workplace. Advancing Women in Leadership, 33, 52- 62.

Sitinjak, T., Gozali. (2012), Strategi Menaklukan Pasar, Jakarta,. Gramedia Pustaka Umum.

Sugiharti, H., & Maula, K. A. (2019). Pengaruh literasi keuangan terhadap perilaku pengelolaan keuangan mahasiswa. Accounthink: Journal of Accounting and Finance, 4(2).

United Nations. (2015). Population Division. World Population Prospects. The 2015 Revision. New York: United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-22

How to Cite

Insan Baihaqqy, M. R. (2022). Pengaruh Literasi Keuangan terhadap Perilaku Keuangan dengan Kelompok Generasi sebagai Mediasi dan Moderasi. Coopetition : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 13(1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v13i1.1189