IMPLIKASI FILSAFAT KRITISISME IMMANUEL KANT BAGI PENGEMBANGAN STUDI HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH

Authors

  • Ginan Wibawa Program Studi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, STAI Yapata Al-Jawami Bandung
  • Rizal Muttaqin Program Studi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, STAI Yapata Al-Jawami Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32670/ht.v1i1.775

Abstract

Sharia economic law (fiqh muāmalah) is the main instrument in the
development of contemporary Islamic financial institutions. However, in its
application, there are still various kinds of problems that indicate the
dominance of the ideological-normative paradigm rather than the empiricalobjective paradigm. This paper aims to unravel this problem by looking at
the implications of Immanuel Kant's philosophy in the development of
sharia economic law studies. The method used in this paper is a method of studying documentation and literature which is closely related to the object of
study and other references in the form of the results of previous research and
theories from v arious textbooks and analyzed with a philosophical and
historical approach. This article finds that Kant's philosophy of criticism begins
by placing doubts on the philosophy of rationalism which accepts a priori
knowledge without criticism. But not as skeptical as Hume, Kant tried to
formulate an epistemology that would allow this a priori knowledge to be
accepted. Until finally Kant found an a priori synthesis of knowledge that
bridges between rationalism and empiricism. Therefore, herein lies theurgency
of Kant's epistemological influence on the development of the study of Islamic
economic law which tries to formulate the idea of the importance of combining
ideologyand theory, between normative-idealist and historical-empirical. Thus,
Islamic teachings formulated in Islamic economic law and implemented in
Islamic financial institutions, with their complementary and supplementary
nature, can be an instrumentfor building a value-based economic and financial
system. 

References

Abdullah, M. A. (1992). The Idea of Universality of Ethical Norms in Ghazali andKant.

Turki: Diyanet Vakfi.

Abdullah, M. A. (1995). Falsafah Kalam di Era Postmodernisme. Yogyakarta: Pustaka

Pelajar.

Al-Qaṭān, M. K. (1996). Tārikh Tasyrī’ Al-Islāmi. Riyad: Maktabah al-Ma’ārif li alNashr wa al-Tauzī’.

Al-Sāyis, M. ‘ālî. (1970). Nash’ah al-Faqīh wa al-Ijtihād wa Aṭwāruh. Mesir: Majma’

al-Buhūth al-Islāmiyyah.

Amal, T. A. (1993). Islam dan Tantangan Modernitas: Studi atas Pemikiran Hukum

Fazlur Rahman. Bandung: Mizan.

Auda, J. (2007). Maqāsid al-Sharī’ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. London: The

International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Barbour, I. G. (1966). Issues in Science and Religion. New York: Harper and Torch

Book.

Bertens, K. (1975). Ringkasan Sejarah Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Budiono, A. (2017). Penerapan Prinsip Syariah pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah. Law

and Justice, 2(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v2i1.4337

Dister, N. S. (1992). Descartes, Hume, dan Kant: Tiga Tonggak Filsafat Modern.

In F.

X. M. Sutrisno (Ed.), Para Filsuf Penentu Gerak Zaman. Yogyakarta:

Kanisius.Djuwaini, D. (2010). Pengantar Fiqh Muamalah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka

Pelajar. Fathurrahman, A. (2010). Prospek Pengembangan Ilmu Ekonomi Islam Di

Indonesia

Dalam Prespektif Filsafat Ilmu (Sebuah Kajian Epistemik). La_Riba, 4(2), 179–

https://doi.org/10.20885/lariba.vol4.iss2.art3

Gojali, D. (2019). Implementasi Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah pada Lembaga Keuangan

Syariah. Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Syariah, 1(2), 129–144. Retrieved from

https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/aksy/article/view/5552/pdf

Hamoudi, H. A. (2011). Present at the Resurrection: Islamic Finance and Islamic

Law.

American University International Law Review, 26(4), 1107–1123.

Hardiman, F. B. (2011). Pemikiran-pemikiran yang Membentuk Dunia Modern: Dari

Machiavelli sampai Nietzche. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Kant, I. (1990). Critique of Pure Reason (J. M. D. Meiklejohn, Ed.). New York:Prometheus Books.

Khallāf, A. W. (1978). Ilm Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Khoshroo, S. (2018). Islamic Finance : The Convergence of Faith, Capital, and Power

(University of Oxford). Retrieved from

https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.757793

Malik, M., Malik, A., & Mustafa, W. (2011). Controversies that Make Islamic Banking

Controversial: An Analysis of Issues and Challenges. American Journal of Social

and Management Sciences, 2(1), 41–46.

https://doi.org/10.5251/ajsms.2011.2.1.41.46

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). USA:

Sage Publication.

Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Muhammad, W. I. (2017). Kompatibilitas Regulasi Akad dan Implementasinya pada

Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia; Kasus Bank Muamalat. Prosiding Seminar

Nasional & Temu Ilmiah Jaringan Peneliti, 281–292. Banyuwangi: IAI

Darussalam.

Muthmainnah, L. (2018). Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Epistemologi Immanuel Kant(1724-

. Jurnal Filsafat, 28(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.31549

Nienhaus, V. (2011). Islamic Finance Ethics and Shari’ah Law in the Aftermath of the

Crisis: Concept and Practice of Shari’ah Compliant Finance. Ethical Perspectives,

(4), 591–623. https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.18.4.2141849

Rahman, F. (1985). Gerakan Pembaharuan dalam Islam di Tengah Tantangan Dewasa

ini. In H. Nasution & A. Azra (Eds.), Perkembangan Modern dalam Islam. Jakarta:

Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Solomon, R. C., & Higgins, K. M. (2000). Sejarah Filsafat (S. Pasaribu, Ed.).

Yogyakarta: Bentang.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung:

Alfabeta.

Suhendi, H. (2014). Fiqh Muamalah. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Susanto, H. (2011). Kritisisme Sejarah Teologi Barat. Tsaqafah, 7(2), 299.

https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v7i2.11

Widiadharma, N., & Arif, M. (2016). Kritisisme Kant: Relevansinya Bagi Teologi Islam

dan Kemiskinan. Refleksi: Jurnal Filsafat Dan Pemikiran Islam, 16(1), 19–36.

https://doi.org/10.14421/ref.2016.%25x

Wittimena, R. A. (2010). Filsafat Kritis Immanuel Kant: Mempertimbangkan Kritik

Karl Amriks Terhadap Kritik Immanuel Kant atas Metafisika. Jakarta: Evolitera.

Yusdani, Y. (2007). Islamisasi Model al-Faruqi dan Penerapannya dalam Ilmu Ekonomi

Islam di Indonesia (Suatu Kritik Epistemik). La_Riba, 1(1), 77–94.

https://doi.org/10.20885/lariba.vol1.iss1.art6

Zahrah, A. (n.d.). Tārīkh al-Madzāhib al-Fiqhiyyah. Kairo: Mathba’al-Madanī.

Zuhdi, M. H. (2014). Karakteristik Pemikiran Hukum Islam. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu

Syariah, 14(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v14i2.1276

Downloads

Published

2021-11-22

How to Cite

Wibawa, G. ., & Rizal Muttaqin. (2021). IMPLIKASI FILSAFAT KRITISISME IMMANUEL KANT BAGI PENGEMBANGAN STUDI HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH. Humantech : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 1(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.32670/ht.v1i1.775