TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IN BURU REGENCY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Buru Regency is one of the regencies in Maluku Province, and it is well-known for
producing high-quality eucalyptus oil. Buru Regency also has a number of potential
tourism objects, including natural tourism, marine tourism, agrotourism, and
cultural and historical tourism, all of which can be developed as a source of revenue
for the region. The purpose of this qualitative research with a descriptive approach
is to determine the influence of internal and external factors on tourism development
and to identify the most appropriate tourism development strategy to be used in Buru
Regency. The research is being conducted in tourist attractions throughout the Buru Regency, the local government and the tourism office are also the sources of
information. The research instrument used was observation, interviews, and
questionnaires, as well as a literature review. The data analysis technique used
SWOT, which has been based on an assessment of the factors that impact tourism in
Buru Regency. The findings indicate that both internal (strength-weakness) and
external (opportunity-threat) factors influence tourism development in Buru
Regency. The mapping of internal and external factors via SWOT analysis
determines the SO (strength-opportunity) strategy as the primary strategy choice,
namely using strength (strength). Internally through the development of special
interest tourism, network building among tourism object managers, collaboration
with local and foreign travel agents, website development, coordination between
regional and central agencies, structuring tourism institutions, and facilitating
investment in the tourism sector. Other alternative strategies that the Buru Regency
government can use in tourism development include the WO (strategiesweaknessopportunity), ST (strength-threat), and WT (weakness-threat) that can be applied in
tourism development by the Buru Regency government.
Article Details
References
Abadi, F., Sahebi, I., Arab, A., Alavi, A., & Karachi, H. (2018). Application of best-worst
method in evaluation of medical tourism development strategy. Decision Science
Letters, 7(1), 77-86.
BPS. (2021). Kabupaten Buru Dalam Angka 2021. Buru: BPS.
Buru, D. P. (2018). Rencana Induk Pengembangan Pariwisata 2018-2022.
Farhan, H., & Anwar, K. (2016). The tourism development strategy based on rural and
local wisdom. Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(3), 170-181.
Peraturan Pemerintah RI No. 50. (2011). Tentang Rencana Induk Pembangunan
Kepariwisataan Nasional Tahun 2020-2025.
Polnyotee, M., & Thadaniti, S. (2015). Community-based tourism: A strategy for
sustainable tourism development of Patong Beach, Phuket Island, Thailand. Asian
Social Science, 11(27), 90.
Rangkuti, F. (2006). Analisis Swot Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis. Jakarta: Gramedia
Pustaka Utama
Reihanian, A., Mahmood, N. Z. B., Kahrom, E., & Hin, T. W. (2012). Sustainable tourism
development strategy by SWOT analysis: Boujagh National Park, Iran. tourism
management Perspectives, 4, 223-228.
Siswanto, A. (2015). Eco-Tourism Development Strategy Balurannational Park in the
Regency of Situbondo, East Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Evaluation
and Research in Education, 4(4), 185-195.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Undang-Undang No 10. (2009). Tentan Kepariwisataan.
Wardiyanta, M. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Andi.
WHO. (2021). WHO Europe. Diambil kembali dari www.euro.who.int: