FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEMAMPUAN AUDITOR DALAM MENDETEKSI KECURANGAN (FRAUD) (Studi Empiris Pada Auditor BPK RI di Jakarta Pusat)
Article Sidebar
Independence,
Competence,
Simple Random Sampling,
Professional Skepticism
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study aims to analyze the effects of skepticism professional, independency, and competency on ability to detect fraud. Research is conducted on auditors working in the audit board of the Republic of Indonesia in Central Jakarta. The population in this research is an auditor who works at audit board of the Republic of Indonesia in Central Jakarta, the research method used is simple random sampling. Based on the method, which is willing to be a respondent as many as 106 auditors. The data in this research is the primary data obtained through questionnaires. The data analysis method used is statistical analysis in the form of multiple regression tests. Data processed using SPSS v26. The results of this study show that the skepticism professional positively affects the ability to detect fraud. Similarly, the independent has no effect on ability to detect fraud. Meanwhile, competence positively affects the ability to detect fraud.
Article Details
References
Abbott, L.J., Park, Y., & Parker, S. (2000). The effects of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance, 26(11), 55–68.
Aderibigbe, P. (2005). Auditor’s independence and corporate fraud. Journal of Social Science, 10(2), 135–139.
Adnyani, N., Atmadja, A.T., & Herawati, N.T. (2014). Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesional Auditor, Independensi, dan Pengalaman Auditor terhadap Tanggungjawab Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan dan Kekeliruan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Kasus pada Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) Wilayah Bali. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi UNDIKSHA, 2(1), 1-11.
Albrecht, W.S., Albrecht, C.O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M.F. (2011). Fraud examination. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Carpenter, T., Durtschi, C., & Gaynor, L.M. (2002). The role of experience in professional skepticism, knowledge acquisition, and fraud detection. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.598.3570&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Gusti, M., & Ali, S. (2008). Hubungan Skeptisme Profesional Auditor dan Situasi Audit, Etika, Pengalaman serta Keahlian Audit dengan Ketepatan Pemberian Opini oleh Akuntan Publik. Retrieved from http://digilib.mercubuana.ac.id/manager/t!@file_artikel_abstrak/Isi_Artikel_696241122717.pdf
Hurtt, R.K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C.E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32, 45–97.
Huslina, H., & Islahuddin, N.S. (2015). Pengaruh Integritas Aparatur, Kompetensi Aparatur, dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Efektivitas Sistem Pencegahan Fraud. Jurnal Administrasi Akuntansi: Program Pascasarjana UNSYIAH, 4(1), 55-64.
Lastanti, H. S. (2005). Tinjauan Terhadap Kompetensi dan Independensi Akuntan Publik: Refleksi Atas Skandal Keuangan. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing, dan Informasi, 5(1), 85–97.
Noviyanti, S. (2008). Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 5(1), 102–125.
Rahmayani, L., Kamaliah, & Susilatri. (2014). Pengaruh kemampuan auditor, skeptisme profesional auditor, teknik audit dan whistleblower terhadap efektivitas pelaksanaan audit investigasi dalam pengungkapan kecurangan. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Fakultas Ekonomi, 1(2), 1–15.
Widiyastuti, M., & Pamudji, S. (2009). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Profesionalisme Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Fraud). Value Added: Majalah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 5(2), 52-73.