Dampak kebijakan keringanan pajak terhadap penerimaan pajak, tax ratio, dan perubahan penerimaan pajak: Analisis pengampunan pajak, sunset policy, dan program pengungkapan sukarela di Indonesia

Main Article Content

Frias Valentino Kanna Ewanan
Diana Sari

Abstract

Since 1964 until now, in 2022, the government of the Republic of Indonesia has had a habit of forgiving taxpayers who do not comply with tax regulations, such as by forgiving administrative sanctions or criminal sanctions. This study aims to determine the impact of tax relief policies on tax revenues, tax ratios, and changes in tax revenues. This study uses a qualitative approach by analyzing secondary data. The results of this study are that the application of tax relief policies (Tax Amnesty, Sunset Policy, or Voluntary Disclosure Program) in 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1984, 2008, 2009, 2016, and 2022 is a door to pave the way for injustice in the Republic of Indonesia because, as long as the policy was running, only the Sunset Policy in 2008 was quite successful. Researchers also consider that this policy is one that violates the fifth precept of Pancasila because people who have obeyed will feel no longer valued. Then, this can also result in money laundering as long as the tax relief policy is implemented because the ransom money or its equivalent is not questionable.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kanna Ewanan, F. V. ., & Sari, D. . (2022). Dampak kebijakan keringanan pajak terhadap penerimaan pajak, tax ratio, dan perubahan penerimaan pajak: Analisis pengampunan pajak, sunset policy, dan program pengungkapan sukarela di Indonesia. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(Spesial Issue 4), 3232–3246. Retrieved from https://journal.ikopin.ac.id/index.php/fairvalue/article/view/3007
Section
Articles

References

Andrian, R. (2016). Analisis Penerapan Tax Amnesty Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Wajib

Pajak Dan Penerimaan Pajak.

Awaeh, M. A., Lambey, L. L. L., & Pinatik, S. (2017). Analisis Efektivitas Penerapan Tax Amnesty

(Pengampunan Pajak) Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Bitung.

Jurnal Emba: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 5(2).

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2016). Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan Atas Laporan

Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2016. Jakarta: Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik

Indonesia.

Biro Pusat Statistik Djakarta. (1971). Statistik Indonesia (Statistical Pocketbook Of Indonesia) 1968 &

Djakarta: Biro Pusat Statistik.

Elisa Valenta Sari. (2015). Kisah Inflasi 650 Persen Dan Cerutu Ali Wardhana. Cnn Indonesia.

Https://Www.Cnnindonesia.Com/Ekonomi/20150914191532-78-78703/Kisah-Inflasi-650-

Persen-Dan-Cerutu-Ali-Wardhana

Huda, M. K., & Hernoko, A. Y. (2017). Tax Amnesties In Indonesia And Other Countries:

Opportunities And Challenges. Asian Social Science, 13(7), 52–61.

Humas. (2017). Realisasi Tax Amnesty, Menkeu: Tebusan Rp130 Triliun, Deklarasi Rp4.813,4 Triliun,

Dan Repatriasi Rp146 Triliun. Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia.

Https://Setkab.Go.Id/Realisasi-Tax-Amnesty-Menkeu-Tebusan-Rp130-Triliun-Deklarasi-Rp4-

-Triliun-Dan-Repatriasi-Rp146-Triliun/

Kartika, C. A., Nangoi, G. B., & Lambey, R. (2017). Analisis Efektivitas Penerapan Tax Amnesty

(Pengampunan Pajak) Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Dari Wajib Pajak Badan Usaha Pada Kantor

Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Manado. Jurnal Emba: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan

Akuntansi, 5(2).

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2019). Ringkasan Alokasi Dan Realisasi Apbn Tahun

-2000. Retrieved From Portal Data Apbn Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.

Http://Www.Data-Apbn.Kemenkeu.Go.Id/Dataset/Details/1028

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Apbn Kita Edisi Juli 2022. Jakarta: Kementerian

Keuangan Republik Indonesia.

Pravasanti, Y. A. (2018). Dampak Kebijakan Dan Keberhasilan Tax Amnesty Bagi Perekonomian

Indonesia. Kompartemen: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 16(1).

Prawira, I. F. A., & Farida, A. (2015). ’The Effect Of Granting Tax Amnesty To Tax Revenues’.

Research Journal Of Finance And Accounting, 6(4), 158–161.

Republik Indonesia. (1964). Penetapan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1964 Tentang

Peraturan Pengampunan Pajak.

Republik Indonesia. (1983). Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 Tentang Ketentuan Umum Dan

Tata Cara Perpajakan.

Republik Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas

Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 Tentang Ketentuan Umum Dan Tata Cara Perpajakan.

Republik Indonesia. (2021). Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 Tentang Harmonisasi Perpajakan.

Said, E. W. (2017). Tax Policy In Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience Of The Republic Of Indonesia.

Laws, 6(4), 16.

Sari, D., & Mulyati, Y. (2018). The Impact Of Tax Amnesty On Tax Revenue And Tax Ratio: Case In

Indonesia. International Journal Of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.34), 245–247.

Sholihah, I. (2017). The Importance Of Tax Amnesty Policy In Efforts To Overcome Tax Evasion In

Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 16(3), 273–279.

Sos, E. S. K. S., Sos, F. A. S., Si, M., & Hikmah, Y. (2018). Sunset Policy And Its Effect On Tax

Compliance: Case Study Indonesia. International Journal Of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.25),

–126.

Sudiro, A., Shrishti, S., & Dumais, T. N. (2022). Perspektif Keadilan Dalam Pertanggungjawaban

Pidana Bagi Wajib Pajak Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum Dan Tata Cara

Perpajakan. Prosiding Serina, 2(1), 209–216.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R & D. Bandung: Cv Alfabeta.

Supraja, G. (2020). The Effect Of Financial And Non-Financial Compensation On Performance Of

Employees. The International Journal Of Business Management And Technology, 4(4).

Tim Hai Lombok Timur 05. (2022). Fakta Sejarah Hiper-Inflasi Tahun 1965 Indonesia, Soekarno

Terapkan Berbagai Kebijakan Dalam Mengatasi Inflasi. Lomboktimur.Com.

Https://Lomboktimur.Pikiran-Rakyat.Com/Ekonomi-Bisnis/Pr-2555446222/Fakta-Sejarah-

Hiper-Inflasi-Tahun-1965-Indonesia-Soekarno-Terapkan-Berbagai-Kebijakan-Dalam-

Mengatasi-Inflasi