Pengaruh quality management terhadap green innovation dengan intensitas penelitian dan pengembangan sebagai variabel moderasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v5i3.2561Keywords:
Green innovation; Quality management; Research and Development Intensity; Indonesia Stock ExchangeAbstract
The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze the effect of quality management on green innovation with research and development intensity as a moderating variable. This research was conducted using quantitative methods. The data used in this study is secondary data obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population used in this study were all manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2018-2020. The sample was selected by purposive sampling method so as to produce 17 companies with a total observation of 51 research samples. The analysis technique of this research is Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. Based on the results of the study, it shows that quality management has a significant positive effect on green innovation, the intensity of research and development has a significant and positive effect on green innovation, and the intensity of research and development weakens the relationship between quality management and green innovation.
References
Agustia, D., Permatasari, Y., Fauzi, H., & Sari, M. N. A. (2020). Research and development intensity, firm performance, and green product innovation. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 1039–1049.
Ardito, L., Petruzzelli, A. M., Pascucci, F., & Peruffo, E. (2018). Inter-firm R&D collaboration and green innovation value: the role of family firms involvement and the moderating effect of proximity dimensions. Business Strategy and The Environment, 28(1), 185–197.
Bai, Y., Song, S., Jiao, J., & Yang, R. (2019). The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 819–829.
Block, J. H. (2012). R&D Investment in family and founder firms an agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 248–265.
Cuerva, M. C., Triguero-Cano, Á., & Córcoles, D. (2014). Drivers of green and non-green innovation: empirical evidence in Low-Tech SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 68, 104–113.
Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability‐oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490–506.
Dewi, R. R., & Rahmianingsih, A. (2020). Meningkatkan nilai perusahaan melalui green innovation dan eco-effisiensi. Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, Perbankan Dan Akuntansi, 12(2), 225–243.
Du, J.-L., Liu, Y., & Diao, W. (2019). Assessing regional differences in green innovation efficiency of industrial enterprises in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6), 940.
Husnaini, W., & Tjahjadi, B. (2021). Quality management, green innovation and firm value: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(1), 255–262.
Iqbal, T. (2019b). Impact of quality management on green innovation: A case of Pakistani manufacturing companies. Springer Nature Switzerland, 150, 169–179.
Li, D., Tang, F., & Jiang, J. (2019). Does environmental management system foster corporate green innovation? The moderating effect of environmental regulation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(10), 1242–1256.
Marchi, V. De. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41(3), 614–623.
Sanchez-Sellero, P., & Bataineh, M. J. (2021). How R&D cooperation, R&D expenditures, public funds and R&D intensity affect green innovation? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(9), 1095–1108.
Schiederig, T., Tietze, F., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Green innovation in technology and innovation management–an exploratory literature review. R&d Management, 42(2), 180–192.
Xu, J., Liu, F., & Shang, Y. (2020). R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: Evidence from China. Kybernetes, 50(3), 737–756.
