Mengalihkan perhatian kepada pasar fisik aset kripto (crypto asset) - faktor predisposisi insvestor milenial kepada investasi beresiko
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to find out the factors that influence millennial investors in shifting their intentions to the physical market of crypto assets which is growing rapidly in recent times. The method used in this research is a deductive approach to test a hypothesis. Perceived Risk, Reward Sensitivity , Knowledge become independent variables which then affect the Switching Intention.variable Personal Innovativeness is also presented as a moderating variable. The results of this study indicate that the Perceived Risk and Reward Sensitivity have an effect on Switching Intention in the Physical Crypto Asset Market so that the higher the risk perception felt by millennial investors in the financial asset market other than the crypto asset market and the higher the Reward Sensitivity they know when they decide. to invest in the physical market of crypto assets will increasingly affect their intention to participate in investing in the physical market of crypto assets. In addition, the study found a new finding that the effect of Reward Sensitivity on Switching Intention can be weakened by the moderating variable, namely Personal Innovativeness. This research has contributed to providing new Knowledge about the factors that can influence individual investors in the millennial age in Indonesia on their intention to divert their attention to investing in the physical market of crypto assets.
Article Details
References
Abu Daqar, M. A. M., Arqawi, S., & Karsh, S. A. (2020). Fintech in the eyes of Millennials and Generation Z (the financial behavior and Fintech perception). Banks and Bank Systems, 15(3), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.03
Adrián-Ventura, J., Costumero, V., Parcet, M. A., & Ávila, C. (2019). Reward network connectivity “at rest” is associated with reward sensitivity in healthy adults: A resting-state fMRI study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(3), 726–736.
Barid, M. (2020). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi switching intention pada bank syariah Kota Malang. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Brandon Chez. (2022). Coin Market Cap. Binance Capital Mgmt.
Brown, A. D. (2017). The dynamics of affect: Using newtonian mechanics, reinforcement sensitivity theory, and the cues-tendencies-actions model to simulate individual differences in emotional experience. Northwestern University.
Burch, G. F., Heller, N. A., Burch, J. J., Freed, R., & Steed, S. A. (2015). Student engagement: Developing a conceptual framework and survey instrument. Journal of Education for Business, 90(4), 224–229.
Chang, I. C., Liu, C. C., & Chen, K. (2014). The push, pull and mooring effects in virtual migration for social networking sites. Information Systems Journal, 24(4), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12030
Elisabeth, A., & Syahputra, E. D. (2022). Bappebti ungkap jumlah investor kripto Indonesia capai 9.5 juta per Oktober 2021. Inews.Id. https://bappebti.go.id/resources/docs/pojok_media_2022_01_01_umvhpw7w.pdf
Folkinshteyn, D., & Lennon, M. (2016). Braving bitcoin: A technology acceptance model (TAM) analysis. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 18(4), 220–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2016.1275242
Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018). The supply chain has no clothes: Technology adoption of blockchain for supply chain transparency. Logistics, 2(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics2010002
Gunawan, F. E., & Novendra, R. (2017). An analysis of bitcoin acceptance in Indonesia. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 8(4), 241. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v8i4.3885
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. In European Business Review (Vol. 31, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hasnawiah S, H. S. (2020). Pengaruh preferensi keuntungan relatif, kompatibiitas, kompleksitas, aksesbilitas dan observasibilitas masyarakat terhadap minat menabung di BNI Syariah Kantor Cabang Pembantu Wonomulyo. IAIN Parepare.
Hsieh, J. K., Hsieh, Y. C., Chiu, H. C., & Feng, Y. C. (2012). Post-adoption switching behavior for online service substitutes: A perspective of the push-pull-mooring framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1912–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.010
Imam, G. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariete dengan IBM SPSS 23 8. Yoga Pratama.
Lin, T. C., & Huang, S. L. (2014). Understanding the determinants of consumers’ switching intentions in a standards war. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 19(1), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415190105
Olavia, L. (2022). Bappebti: Fatwa haram kripto tidak berdampak signifikan. Beritasatu.Com. https://www.beritasatu.com/ekonomi/881811/bappebti-fatwa-haram-kripto-tidak-berdampak-signifikan
Park, Y. K., Binh, K. B., & Kim, S. J. (2019). Time varying correlations and causalities between stock and foreign exchange markets: Evidence from China, Japan and Korea. Investment Analysts Journal, 48(4), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2019.1670385
Presthus, W., & O’Malley, N. O. (2017). Motivations and barriers for end-user adoption of bitcoin as digital currency. Procedia Computer Science, 121, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.013
Shaidra, A., Firmansyah, F., & Sulistyowati, R. (2022). Musim ambles investasi kripto. Tempo. https://majalah.tempo.co/read/ekonomi-dan-bisnis/166283/bahaya-krisis-aset-kripto-yang-berkepanjangan
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian kombinasi (Mixed methods). Alfabeta.
Sun, W., Dedahanov, A. T., Shin, H. Y., & Kim, K. S. (2020). Switching intention to crypto-currency market: Factors predisposing some individuals to risky investment. PLoS ONE, 15(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234155