Pengaruh likuiditas dan leverage terhadap agresivitas pajak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v5i1.2288Keywords:
Liquidity, Leverage, Tax aggressiveness, Financial statements, Service CompanyAbstract
The phenomenon of tax aggressiveness regarding companies operating in the health services sector is affiliated with companies in Singapore, namely PT RNI which has been registered as a limited liability company but in terms of capital, the company relies on affiliate debt for a living. This means that owners in Singapore provide loans to RNI in Indonesia. Because its capital is included as tax-deductible debt, RNI avoids liability. The financial statements recorded a loss so that no taxes went into the state. RNI 2014 financial report, recorded debt of Rp 20.4 billion with a company turnover of Rp 2.178 billion. There was a retained loss in the same year's report amounting to Rp. 26.12 billion. Based on the financial statements, this is no longer logical, so the Special DJP Regional Office conducts an examination. Another method used by PT RNI is to utilize Government Regulation 46/2013 on Income Tax specifically for MSMEs, with a final income tax rate of 1 percent. This study aims to obtain empirical evidence of the effect of liquidity and leverage on tax aggressiveness. The objects used are 11 companies in various industrial sectors listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016 – 2020 which were selected by purposive sampling. The analysis technique for this research uses multiple linear regression analysis. Based on data analysis, it was found that liquidity had no statistically significant effect on tax aggressiveness and leverage had no statistically significant effect on tax aggressiveness.
References
Adisamartha, I. B. P. F., & Noviari, N. (2015). Pengaruh likuiditas, leverage, intensitas persediaan dan
intensitas aset tetap pada tingkat agresivitas wajib pajak badan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(3), 973–
Agus, M., Peró-Cebollero, M., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., Portoghese, I., Mascia, M. L., & Penna, M. P. (2020).
What’s about the calibration between confidence and accuracy? Findings in probabilistic problems
from Italy and Spain. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education.
Dharma, N. B. S., & Noviari, N. (2017). Pengaruh corporate social responsibility dan capital intensity
terhadap tax avoidance. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 18(1), 529–556.
Dinar, M., Yuesti, A., & Dewi, N. P. S. (2020). Pengaruh profitabilitas, likuiditas dan leverage terhadap
agresivitas pajak pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI. Kumpulan Hasil Riset
Mahasiswa Akuntansi (KHARISMA), 2(1).
Dong, X., Chen, J., Ma, Y., Wang, J., Chan-Park, M. B., Liu, X., Wang, L., Huang, W., & Chen, P.
(2012). Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic hybrid foam of graphene and carbon nanotube for
selective removal of oils or organic solvents from the surface of water. Chemical Communications,
(86), 10660–10662.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25. Undip.
Hadi, J., & Mangoting, Y. (2014). Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan dan karakteristik dewan terhadap
agresivitas pajak. Tax & Accounting Review, 4(2).
Kasmir. (2016). Analisis laporan keuangan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kurniasih, T., & Ratna Sari, M. (2013). Pengaruh Return on Assets, Leverage, Corporate Governance,
Ukuran Perusahaan Dan Kompensasi Rugi Fiskal Pada Tax Avoidance. Buletin Studi Ekonomi,
(1), 58–66.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An
empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86–108.
Mujiasih, E. (2015). Hubungan antara persepsi dukungan organisasi (perceived organizational support)
dengan keterikatan karyawan (employee engagement). Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 14(1), 40–51.
Putri, A. A., & Hanif, R. A. (2020). Pengaruh likuiditas, leverage, dan komite audit terhadap agresivitas
pajak. CURRENT: Julrnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 1(3), 382–399.
Ramadhani, R. S., & Jumaidi, L. T. (2016). Presumptive tax pajak penghasilan final 1 persen:
memudahkan atau memberatkan unit mikro kecil menengah. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Aksioma,
(2), 96.
Saefi, M., Fauzi, A., Kristiana, E., Adi, W. C., Muchson, M., Setiawan, M. E., Islami, N. N., Ningrum,
D. E. A. F., Ikhsan, M. A., & Ramadhani, M. (2020). Survey data of COVID-19-related
knowledge, attitude, and practices among indonesian undergraduate students. Data in Brief, 31,
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suyanto, K. D., & Supramono, S. (2012). Likuiditas, leverage, komisaris independen, dan manajemen
laba terhadap agresivitas pajak perusahaan. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 16(2).
Tameris, M. D., Hatherill, M., Landry, B. S., Scriba, T. J., Snowden, M. A., Lockhart, S., Shea, J. E.,
McClain, J. B., Hussey, G. D., & Hanekom, W. A. (2013). Safety and efficacy of MVA85A, a
new tuberculosis vaccine, in infants previously vaccinated with BCG: a randomised, placebocontrolled phase 2b trial. The Lancet, 381(9871), 1021–1028.
