Hipotesis pasar efisien: tinjauan pustaka sistematik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v4iSpesial%20Issue%205.2284Keywords:
The efficient market hypothesis; Market efficiency; Stock market; Systematic literature reviewAbstract
In recent years, academics and economists have studied the concept of efficiency as applied to capital markets, the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) being a major research area in the specialization literature. They have opposing views about EMH, some are against EMH, some are in favor of EMH. The efficient market hypothesis states that the price of any asset depends on the information, whereas the behavioral finance theory states that the price depends on the reaction of market participants to the information. The conclusion of this article is that testing market efficiency is difficult and it is likely that due to changes in market or economic conditions, new theoretical models should be developed to take into account all changes. For this reason, it is important to continue empirical studies to decide whether capital markets are efficient or informationally inefficient.
References
Bachelier, L., 1990. Théorie de la speculation, Annales scientifiques de I.E.N.S, Vol. 3, pp.21-86;
Ball, R., Brown, P., 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Autumn, 1968), pp. 159-178;
Baker, M., Ruback, R. S., Wurgler, J., 2007. Behavioral corporate finance: A survey, Eckbo, Espen (ed.) Handbook in Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance. North Holland: Elsevier;
Barna, F., Dima, B., Labunet, A, 2007. Eficien܊a pie܊ei financiare din România- condi܊ie necesară în perspectiva aderării la Uniunea Europeană, MPRA, Paper No. 5870;
Bernard, V. L., Thomas, J. K., 1990. Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol 13, pp. 305-340;
Birau, F. R., 2013. Emerging capital market efficiency: a comparative analysis of weak-form efficiency in Romania and Hungary in the
context of the global financial crisis, Al & Soc, Springer
Cowles, A., 1944. Stock market forecasting, Cowles Commission Papers, New Series, No. 6.;
Cowles, A., 1960. A revision of previous conclusions regarding stock price behavior, Econometrica, Vol. 28, Issue 4, pp. 909-915;
Degutis, A., Novickyte, L., 2014. the Efficient Market Hypothesis: a Critical Review of Literature and Methodology. Ekonomika 93, 7–23.
Dharan, B. G., Ikenberry, D. L., 1995. The long-run negative drift of post-listing stock returns, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, Issue 5, pp. 1547-1574;
Dhankar, R.S., Shankar, D., 2016. Relevance and evolution of adaptive markets hypothesis: a review. J. Indian Bus. Res. 8, 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-12-2015-0125
DeLong, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., Waldmann, R. J., 1990. Noise trader risk in financial markets, Journal of Political Economy
, 703–738;
Fama, E. F., 1965. Random walks in stock market prices, Financial Analysts Journa;
Fama, E. F., 1970. Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, Journal of Finance , Vol. 25, No. 2;
Fama, E. F., 1991. Efficient Capital Markets II, Journal of Finance , Vol. 46, No. 5;
Fama, E. F. Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C.; Roll, R., 1969. The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information, International Economic Review (International Economic Review, Vol. 10, No. 1;
Fama, E. F.; French, K. R., 1993. Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds, Journal of Financial Economics 33;
Firoj, M., Khanom, S., 2018. Efficient Market Hypothesis: Foreign Exchange Market of Bangladesh. Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues 8, 99–103.
Gromb D., Vayanos D., 2010. Limits of arbitrage: the state of the theory, the Paul Woolley centre working paper series No 9, Discussion Paper No 650;
Lo, A. W., MacKinlay, A.C., 1999. A non-random walk down Wall Street, Princeton University Press;
Lo, A. W., Mamaysky, H., Wang, J., 2000. Foundation of technical analysis: computational algorithms, statistical inference, and empirical
implementation, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 55, No. 4;
Loderer, C. and Martin, K., 1996. Post-acquisition performance of acquiring firms, Financial Management, Vol. 21, pp. 69-79;
Louhhran, T., Ritter, J. R., 1995. The new issues puzzle, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 1, Nr. 1;
Malkiel B., 2003. The efficient market hypothesis and its critics, Princeton University, CEPS Working Paper No. 91;
Mitchell, M. L., 1999. Managerial Decisions and Long-Term Stock Price Performance, CRSP WP 453, University of Chicago, Chicago,IL;
Regnault, J., 1863, Calcul des Chances et Philosophie de la Bourse, Library of the University of Toronto;
Sabbaghi, O., Sabbaghi, N., 2018. Market efficiency and the global financial crisis: evidence from developed markets. Stud. Econ. Financ. 35, 362–385.
Sharma, A., Kumar, A., 2019. A review paper on behavioral finance: study of emerging trends. Qual. Res. Financ. Mark. 12, 137–157.
Titan, A. G. (2015). Efficient Market Hypothesis: Review of Specialized Literature and Empirical Research. Procedia Economics and Finance , 32, 442-449.
