Analisis pengaruh fraud diamond terhadap potensi kecurangan program bantuan langsung tunai dana desa Kabupaten Jombang
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study was conducted with the aim of knowing the effect of Fraud Diamond elements which include pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and capability on the potential for fraud in the village fund program in Jombang Regency, East Java. Sources of data in this study were obtained from primary data sources by distributing questionnaires to village heads and village officials in Jombang Regency who came from Jombang District, Mojoagung District, Peterongan District, and Diwek District. The total population of this study was 1,510 with a total of 315 samples and was selected using cluster random sampling technique. The data analysis technique is using multiple linear regression with the help of the IBM SPSS 23 application program. The hypothesis in this study is that the Fraud Diamond Theory element consisting of pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and capability has an influence on the potential for fraud in village funds in Jombang Regency. The test results show that all hypotheses are accepted, namely the Fraud Diamond Theory element affects the potential for fraud in the village fund program in Jombang Regency.
Article Details
References
Aini, N., Prayudi, M. A., Diatmika, P. G., & Ganesha, U. P. (2017). Pengaruh Perspektif Fraud Diamond
Terhadap Kecenderungan Terjadinya Kecurangan ( Fraud ) dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa. 1(1).
Amrizal. (2015). Pencegahan Dan Pendeteksian Kecurangan. Badan Pengawasan Keuangan Dan
Pembangunan.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Learning Theories for Early Years Practice, 63–65.
Brofenbenner, U. (1974). Ecological Systems Theory. 1–4. http://people.usd.edu/~mremund/bronfa.pdf
Darsono. (2001). Korupsi Sebagai Kompensasi Underpayment: Suatu Tinjauan Teori Equity.pdf. Jurnal
Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 3(2), 477.
DJPK Depkeu. (2022). Rincian Alokasi Transfer Ke Daerah Dan Dana Desa. Provinsi/Kabupaten/Kota
Dalam APBN. Retreived January 9, 2022. www.djpk.depkeu.go.id.
Febriani, F., & Suryandari, D. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap
Kecenderungan Kecurangan (Fraud): Persepsi Pegawai Pada Dinas Kota Tegal. Jurnal Akuntansi,
(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.9.1.33-46
Freud, S. (1920). The Case of Anna O Defense Mechanisms Psychosexual Stages. 1–12.
Ghozali, I. (2006). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Simposium Nasional
Akuntansi, 0812253824(024), 23–26.
Griffin, R. W., & Ebert, R. J. (2015). Pengantar Bisnis (Adi maulana (ed.); 15th ed.). Erlangga PT.
Gelora Aksara Pratama.
Hasibuan, M. S. . (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.
Hormati, G. A., & Pesudo, D. A. A. (2019). Pengaruh Tekanan, Kesempatan, Rasionalisasi dan
Kemampuan Terhadap Kecenderungan Aparatur Sipil Negara dalam Melakukan Kecurangan
Akuntansi Studi Empiris Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow Timur.
Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Humanika, 9(2), 172–190.
I.C. Kusuma, et al. (2019). Pengaruh Pressure, Opportunity, Rasionalization dan Capability Terhadap
Kecenderungan Kecurangan Aakuntansi (Fraud). 54–68.
IAI. (2012). Standart Profesional Akuntan Publik. Salemba Empat.
Indriani, I., Suroso, A., & Maghfiroh, S. (2016). Penerapan Konsep Fraud Diamond Theory Dalam
Mendeteksi Perilaku Fraud. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX, 1–43.
Irwansyah, I., & Syufriadi, B. (2019). Pengaruh Efektivitas Pengendalian Internal, Kesesuain
Kompensasi, Moralitas Manajemen, Ketaatan Aturan Akuntansi, Dan Asimetri Informasi
Terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi, 8(2), 89–100.
https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.8.2.89-100
Jombangkab. (2021). Jombang Sosialisasikan Perbup Pengelolaan Dana Desa, ADD, Dan PDRD 2021.
Pemkab Jombang. https://www.jombangkab.go.id/berita/pemkab-jombang-sosialisasikan-
perbup-pengelolaan-dana-desa-add-dan-pdrd-tahun-2021
Kabarjombang.com. (2021). Korupsi Dana Desa, Kejari Jombang Tahan Mantan Kades. Kabar
Jombang. https://kabarjombang.com/hukum-kriminal/korupsi-dana-desa-kejari-jombang-tahan-
mantan-kades/
PMK-222 MK.07 2020 Pengelolaan Dana Desa, (2020).
Lombroso:, C. (1876). Theory of crime, criminal mane, and atavism. SimplyPsychology, 718.
Mustikasari, D. . (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Fraud Di Sektor Pemerintahan Kabupaten
Batang. Accounting Analysis Journal, 2(3), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v2i3.2492
Pamungkas, I. D., Wahyudi, S., & Achmad, T. (2020). Whistleblowing system and fraud early warning
system on village fund fraud : The indonesian experience. 5, 151–158.
Peraturan Pemerintah. (2014). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 60 Tahun 2014 tentang Dana Desa yang Bersumber dari APBN (pp. 1–8).
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 8
Tahun 2016 Tentang Dana Desa. 2, 1–12.
Pramudita, A. (2013). Analisis Fraud Di Sektor Pemerintahan Kota Salatiga. Accounting Analysis
Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v2i1.1156
Radar Jombang Jawa Pos. (2021). Anggota DPRD Jombang Jadi Tersangka, Korupsi Dana Desa 2015.
Retrieved December 15, 2021. https://radarjombang.jawapos.com/hukum/15/12/2021/anggota-
dprd-jombang-jadi-tersangka-korupsi-dana-desa-2015
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences (3rd ed., Vol. 31). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.156
Sherliana, C., & Nuswantara, D. A. (2021). The Effect of Fraud Diamond Elements on the Potential of
Village Fund Fraud, Blitar District, Indonesia. The International Journal of Business &
Management, 9(3), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.24940/theijbm/2021/v9/i3/bm2103-049
Tuanakotta, T. M. (2015). Audit Kontemporer (2015: 93). Salemba Empat.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of
Fraud. CPA Journal, 12(74), 38–42.