Pengaruh unemployment rate terhadap tingkat depresi dan anxiety dengan unemployment benefit sebagai mediator

Main Article Content

Maylinda Primadanik
Robert Arthur Simanjuntak

Abstract

This study contributes to the growing the literature on the relationship between unemployment rate on depression and anxiety’s index. By adding the unemployment benefit variable as a mediating variable, this study aims to determine the direct effect, indirect effect and total effect of the relationship between the unemployment rate and depression and anxiety’s index. In addition, this study also analyzes the role of the unemployment benefit variable in mediating the relationship between the unemployment rate variable and depression and anxiety’s index. By using the path analysis method of panel data, this study shows (1) in Vietnam, the appreciation of the unemployment rate indirectly increases the level of depression and anxiety by including the unemployment benefit variable as a mediator and (2) in Japan, the appreciation of the unemployment rate can indirectly increase the level of depression and anxiety by including the variable unemployment benefits as a mediator. Overall, the variable of unemployment benefits in Vietnam and Japan mediates variables partially (partial mediation).

Article Details

How to Cite
Primadanik, M. ., & Simanjuntak, R. A. . (2022). Pengaruh unemployment rate terhadap tingkat depresi dan anxiety dengan unemployment benefit sebagai mediator. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(Spesial Issue 5), 2045–2054. https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v4iSpesial Issue 5.1628
Section
Articles

References

Agus P., Erwan & Dyah, R. 2012. Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Gava. Media: Yogyakarta

Arifiato, A. (2004) Reformasi Sistem Jaminan Sosial di Indonesia. SMERU

Askitas, N., Zimmerman, K.F., (2009). Google Econometrics and Unemployment Forecasting. Applied Economics Quarterly .55

Baron, R., & Kenny, D., (1968). The Moderator-Mediator Variabel Distinction in Social Psycological Reasearch. Journal of Personality and Social Psycology

Choi, H., & Varian, H. (2009). Predicting the Present with Google Trends. Elsevier

Clark, A., & Oswald, A. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. JSTOR.

Cylus, J., Glymour, M. & Avendano, M. (2015). Health Effects of Unemployment Benefit Program Generosity. American journal of public health.

Cylus, J., & Avendano, M. (2017). Receiving Unemployment benefits May Have Positive Effects On the Health of the Unemployed. Journal Health.

DiTella, R., MacCulloch R. J., & Oswald. (2001). Preferences over inflation and Unemployment: evidance from survey of happiness. American economic review.

Fahri, Jalil, A., & Kasnelly, S. (2019). Meningkatnya Angka Pengangguran Ditengah Pandemi. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah. Volume 2. Edisi 2.

Feist, J. (2009). Theories of Personality (7th ed). New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Gallup Healthways. (2013). How Does the Gallup-Sharecare Well Being Index Work. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/175196/gallup-healthways-index-methodology.aspx

Lalive, R. & Zweimuller, J. (2009). The public health cost of job loss. Econpapers.repec.org

Ross, C.E., & Mirowsky, J. (2003). Social structure and psycological functioning: Distress, perceived control, and trust. Handbook of social psycology (pp. 411-447)

Ruhm, C.J., (2003). Good times make you sick. Journal of health economics.

Suliyanto. 2011. Ekonometrika Terapan Teori dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS.Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offiset.

Stuart, G. W., & Sundeen. (2016). Principle and Practice of Psychiatric Nursing, (1st edition). Singapore: Elsevier.

Tefft, N. (2011). Insight on unemployment, Unemploymentinsurance, and mental health. Journal of health economics. Science direct.