Basic Research OECD Framework Untuk Menanggulangi Base Erosion Profit Shifting (Studi Komparasi Indonesia Malaysia)
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research is motivated by globalization and increasing digital economic activities, which by said activity Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) is more likely to occur. With the issuance of a global consensus as a new framework, hopefully it can be a viable solution to digital economy taxation and reducing the amount of erosion of the tax base of each jurisdiction. The focus of this study was to find out the perspective of the two countries in implementing the two pillars of the global consensus. This research was conducted in 2021, after the Global Consensus Blueprint on Pillar I and II were issued by the OECD earlier in July. This research focused on providing an understanding about the global consensus regarding the two pillars. The approach used in this study was a qualitative approach. Data collection was carried out through literature studies and interviews from three representative parties, namely the governments, the academics, and the consultants. With the new taxation nexus, as well as profit allocation, and including the minimum tax rate which are the main points in both of the pillars, this research would cover the advantages and disadvantages for Indonesia in implementing the two pillars. In addition, it would also cover the arising challenges that the Indonesian government has to face; both in terms of legal and administrative perspective in the implementation of this new framework.
Article Details
References
Altenburg, N., dan K. Schlüke (2021), “The New World of Pillar One – Practical Thoughts on the New Scope”, IBFD International Transfer Pricing Journal 2022, Vol. 29 No. 1. hal.
Arifin, Nanang Z. (2014). “BEPS dalam Kerangka Kerja Sama G20 dan Implementasinya kepada Indonesia” Opinion Paper, https://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/files/berita-kajian/file/BEPS%20Dalam%20Kerangka%20Kerja%20Sama%20G20%20Dan%20Implementasinya%20Kepada%20Indonesia.pdf, diakses dan diunduh pada: 2 Desember 2021.
Bain & Company (2020),” e-Conomy Sea 2020 at Full Velocity: Resilient and Racing Ahead” Report Paper, www.bain.com/globalassets/noindex/2020/e_conomy_sea_2020_report.pdf, diakses dan diunduh pada: 2 Desember 2021.
Badan Pusat Statistik (2020). “Survei E-Commerce, 2020” Report Paper, https://sirusa.bps.go.id/sirusa/index.php/dasar/pdf?kd=3593&th=2020, diakses dan diunduh pada: 2 Desember 2021.
Billsten, J., Fridell, M., Holmberg, R., & Ivarsson, A. (2018). Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC) test used in the implementation of assessment instruments and treatment methods in a Swedish National study. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 84, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.10.004 Cooper, M., & Nguyen, Q. T. (2019). Understanding the interaction of motivation and opportunity for tax planning inside US multinationals: A qualitative study. Journal of World Business, 54(6), 101023.
Darussalam, Danny S., dan B. Bawono K. (2017). Transfer Pricing: Ide, Strategi, dan Panduan Praktis dalam Perspektif Pajak Internasional.
De la Cuesta-Gonzáles, M., dan Eva Pardo. (2019). “Corporate Tax Disclosure on a CSR Basis: a New Reporting Framework in the Post-BEPS Era” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 32 No. 7. Hal. 2167-2192.
Devereux, M. P., B. Lockwood, M. Redoano. (2008). “Do Countries Compete Over Corporate Tax Rates?” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 92. No. 5. Hal. 1210-1235. De la Cuesta-González, M., & Pardo, E. (2019). Corporate tax disclosure on a CSR basis: a new reporting framework in the post-BEPS era. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
Devereux, M. P., Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. (2008). Do countries compete over corporate tax rates?. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5-6), 1210-1235. Dunn, W. N. (2000). Analisis Kebijakan Publik Edisi Kedua.
Hanpachem, C. (1997). The Extension Of The Theory Of Margin: A Framework For Assessing Readiness For Change. Colorado State University.
Indoensia. e-Conomy SEA. 2020
Jansky, Petr (2020), “Corporate Effective Tax Rates for Research and Policy” Discussion Paper, https://ideas.repec.org/p/fau/wpaper/wp2020_41.html#download, diakses dan diunduh pada: 2 Desember 2021.
Kumalasari, Kartika P. dan Nurlita Sukma A. (2020). Pajak Internasional. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Kurniawan, Anang M. (2015). Pajak Internasional Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Tambunan, Maria (2020). “Adopting BEPS Inclusive Framework in Indonesia: Taxation Issues and Challenges in a Digital Era”, Bisnis dan Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, Vol. 27 No. 3. Artikel 4.
Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013)
Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2021). OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Statement on the Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy: The Frequently Ask Question. DIunduh 3 Desember 2021 https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/faqs-statement-on-a-two-pillar-solution-to-address-the-tax-challenges-arising-from-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy-october-2021.pdf
Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change Readiness: A Multilevel Review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457417
Stevens, G. W. (2013). Toward a Process-Based Approach of Conceptualizing Change Readiness. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(3), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886313475479
Wells, Bret, dan Cym Lowell (2013). “Tax Base Erosion: Reformation of Section 482’s Arm’s Length Standard”. Discussion Paper, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2431764_code1732621.pdf?abstractid=2310882&mirid=1, diakses dan diunduh pada: 2 Desember 2021.