An analysis of directive speech act found in “M3GAN” movie (2023)

Authors

  • I Gusti Ayu Intan Triana Putri Universitas Mahasaraswati
  • Ida Ayu Mela Tustiawati Universitas Mahasaraswati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32670/ht.v3i1.3805

Keywords:

Directive, Speech act, Horror, Pragmatic

Abstract

The objective of this research is to examine the various forms of directive expressions in the 2023 film “Horror Megan,” The researchers employed Yule’s theory of speech acts for this investigation. A qualitative approach was utilized by the researchers to scrutinize the directive expressions present in the movie. During the analysis process, distinct categories of directive speech acts were identified. A total of 39 instances of directive speech acts were collected in this study. These instances were further classified into four subcategories: asking (17 instances), ordering (14 instances), requesting (5 instances), and suggesting (3 instance). Furthermore, the researchers provided insights into the underlying purposes of each type of directive speech act throughout the narrative. In this study only found four types of directive illocutionary act, they are asking, ordering, requesting and suggesting. Among all the data collected from the movie, the predominant form observed in this study was Asking, which was the most prevalent.

References

Agus, M. H. (2016). Ilmu Komunikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Agustini. (2021). An Analysis of Illocutionary Act found In Johnny English Strikes Again Movie (Thesis). Mahasaraswati University.

Arsyad, A. (2011). Media pembelajaran. PT Raja grafindo persada.

Br Barus, W., & Rudiansyah. (2021). Proceedings Sarana Perkembangan Bahasa Dan Pengenalan Budaya Tiongkok Di Era Digital. Seminar Nasional Pembelajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra (SELASAR), 1, 5.

Bramono, N., & Rahman, M. (2012). Pergeseran dan pemertahanan bahasa. Diglossia: Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Kebahasaan Dan Kessustraan, 4(1), 1–7.

Devi. (2021). Analysis of Directive Illocutionary Acts on Imperfect Movie (Thesis). Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram.

Dewi, A., Hidayat, R., Widhagdha, M. F., & Purwanto, W. (2020). Dinamika Komunikasi dalam Resolusi Konflik Sosial. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 11(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jkp.v11i1.7887

Hasler-Barker, M. (2018). Pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics (pp. 437–456). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779194.021

Hidayat, A. (2016). Speech acts: Force behind words. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v9i1.415

Ismani, S. D., Effendi, T., Sastra Inggris, J., Sastra, F., & Budaya, D. (2022). Speech Act Analysis On The Main Character’s Utterance In Up Movie. Jambura Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 49–56.

Kreidler, C. (2013). Introducing English Semantics. Routledge.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.

Noermanzah, N. (2019). Bahasa sebagai alat komunikasi, citra pikiran, dan kepribadian. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 306–319.

Rohmahwati, A., & Yuliasri, I. (2017). Violation of politeness maxims in the television series the big bang theory. English Education Journal, 7(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v7i1.14688

Saputri, N. N. I. E., Suastini, N. W., & Karya, I. W. S. (2021). The illocutionary acts in Melati and Isabel Wijsen’s ted talk. Elysian Journal: English Literature, Linguistics and Translation Studies, 1(1).

Searle, J. R. (2011). Speech Acts an Essay in The Philosophy of Language 34th Ed.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. ALFABETA.

Sukmawati, D. B. (2022). an Analysis of Illocutionary Acts in the “Sing” Movie. Dharmas Education Journal (DE_Journal), 3(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.56667/dejournal.v3i2.794

Yule, G. (1996). [George_Yule]_Pragmatics(BookFi).pdf. 138.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-25

How to Cite

Putri, I. G. A. I. T. ., & Tustiawati, I. A. M. . (2023). An analysis of directive speech act found in “M3GAN” movie (2023). Humantech : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 3(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.32670/ht.v3i1.3805